COBRA Description
We just recently saw that the Navy declared initial operating capability for the LCS' Coastal Battlefield Reconnaissance and Analysis (DVS-1 COBRA) system. We expressed severe doubt about that and wondered about the rationale behind the plan to order 30 of the systems despite only having 8 LCS MCM platforms (see, “COBRA Declared Operational”). That aside, COBRA is a rarely discussed system and there is not a lot of information about it that is generally available so let’s take a brief look at what we do know.
COBRA is intended to detect and localize mines in the surf and beach zones as well as provide visual reconnaissance of the zones. The system is carried on an unmanned MQ-8 Fire Scout UAV deployed from an LCS and consists of the sensor package and data collection station on the UAV plus a mission control and planning package on the host LCS (3).
The current Block 1 version can detect surface laid mines and obstacles in the beach zone and has a more limited capability to do the same in the surf zone. It is limited to daytime use only due to the need for illumination for the imager, much as a regular camera needs a light source. Data is collected and analyzed post-mission after recovery.
A developmental Block 2 version is intended to enhance the surf zone capability and add a nighttime illuminator. The developmental Block 2 illuminator is a new technology effort. It is, essentially, a flashlight that is required to provide illumination for the COBRA camera. The problem is that current electro-optical illuminators cover only a single wavelength band and cannot support the 6-band COBRA multi-spectral sensor (2).
COBRA uses a passive, multi-spectral sensor which covers 6 wavelength bands from near UV to near infrared. The sensor is capable of providing 4 frames per second (4 Hz) for the 6 bands with a 16M camera (4896x3264) yielding a Ground Sample Distance (GSD) of 2.4" which translates into 6.1 Gigabits per second (Gbps) of data (1).
Military and Aerospace website states that the COBRA payload includes stabilized step stare digital gimbal and high-resolution multispectral imaging digital camera with a spinning six-color filter wheel, a processing unit, and a solid-state data storage unit which collects six different color-band images across a large area using a step-stare pattern (4).
Military and Aerospace website states that the COBRA payload includes stabilized step stare digital gimbal and high-resolution multispectral imaging digital camera with a spinning six-color filter wheel, a processing unit, and a solid-state data storage unit which collects six different color-band images across a large area using a step-stare pattern (4).
The system appears to be effective mainly in the beach zone with little water depth penetration in the surf zone – not surprising given that it is, essentially, just a camera with a wavelength expanded beyond just the visual.
 |
| COBRA Surf and Beach Zone Reconnaissance |
One of the weaknesses of the system is that the data is not available in real time and requires post-mission analysis which means the UAV must survive in order for the data to be available. Thus, a UAV could complete an entire reconnaissance mission only to be shot down at the end and all the data would be lost.
Another weakness is the operational concept. A good sized, low, slow flying, non-stealthy, non-maneuvering (has to remain reasonably steady during its recon run) helo passing back and forth across the shore line just can't have much of a life expectancy. This is the classic definition of a target drone! In combat, we're going to go through these like candy! As with so many of today's operational concepts, the success of the system depends on the enemy cooperating by not shooting down this sitting duck of a target and allowing us to recon the beach unimpeded. Does that seem like a reasonable assumption to base a combat operational concept on? Seriously, who comes up with these things?
Another weakness is the operational concept. A good sized, low, slow flying, non-stealthy, non-maneuvering (has to remain reasonably steady during its recon run) helo passing back and forth across the shore line just can't have much of a life expectancy. This is the classic definition of a target drone! In combat, we're going to go through these like candy! As with so many of today's operational concepts, the success of the system depends on the enemy cooperating by not shooting down this sitting duck of a target and allowing us to recon the beach unimpeded. Does that seem like a reasonable assumption to base a combat operational concept on? Seriously, who comes up with these things?
The coverage area of the system depends on the sensor being raised above the beach/surf. This is the same as a regular camera being able to “see” more of an image the further back it is held from the scene. Thus, COBRA is not applicable to, for example, an unmanned surface vessel. It could, presumably, be deployed from any aircraft large enough to carry the system.
COBRA is intended to complement the AES-1 Airborne Laser Mine Detection System (ALMDS) which is operated from the MH-60 helo and provides laser detection of surface and near-surface mines past the surf zone.
As stated, I have severe doubts that the system is operational, reliable, and effective. I’ll wait to see a DOT&E assessment before accepting the system as combat effective.
_______________________________
Belum ada Komentar untuk "COBRA Description"
Posting Komentar